J. M. Kubler
To Win
H. Grenier
To Win
Dane Sweeny vs Jason Murray Kubler Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W W W L
Form
W W W L W W W L W WHead-To-Head: Sweeny 1 - 1 Kubler
They have played 6 sets in total, with Sweeny winning 3 and Kubler winning 3. The last match between Sweeny and Kubler was at the M25 Swan Hill, 22-03-2025, Semifinals, Grass with Dane Sweeny getting the victory 6-1 6-7(4) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dane Sweeny | 1 |
| Jason Murray Kubler | 1 |
M25 Swan Hill(22-03-2025)
6
1
6
7
6
4
| Sweeny | Stats | Kubler |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (13-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 77% (23-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 579 | Ranking | 307 |
| 194 | Highest Rank | 63 |
| 24 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 23 |
| 55% (178-144) | Career Total W/L | 67% (437-213) |
| $346,065 | Career Prize Money | $1,200,795 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-7(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Dane Sweeny
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
6
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
10
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Dane Sweeny
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
109)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 32 | Games Won | 30 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 29 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 2:17:53 | Average Match Time | 2:17:53 |
| 68% (126/185) | 1st Serve % | 55% (101/184) |
| 66% (83/126) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (81/101) |
| 54% (32/59) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (33/83) |
| 57% (8/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (7/15) |
| 38% (70/184) | Return Points Win % | 38% (70/185) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dane Sweeny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Dane Sweeny
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
13
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
73)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
6
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
10
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Omar Jasika
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
109)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
24%
(
6 of
25)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-0 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Ethan Cook
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Matthew Hulme
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
9
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Dane Sweeny
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Christian Langmo
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
6
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Stefan Storch
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
7
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Dane Sweeny
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
7
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
4
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jason Murray Kubler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Adam Walton
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
41%
(
17 of
41)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Soon-Woo Kwon
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
64%
(
77 of
121)
1st Serve %
64%
(
85 of
133)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
58 of
85)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
40%
(
48 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
133)
130
Total Points Won
124
|
7-6(6) 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Hyeon Chung
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Rei Sakamoto
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
11
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
6
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
10
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
9
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Jarrod Joyce
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Yuichiro Inui
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
13
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (178/144) | Win/Loss | 67% (437/213) |
| 53% (398/359) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (970/544) |
| 51% (3661/3481) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (7867/6371) |
| 59% (145/102) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (155/80) |
| 44% (17/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 70% (243/105) |
| 37% (7/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (6/10) |
| 53% (9/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 65% (33/18) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 693 | Aces Total | 2106 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1012 | Total Double Faults | 1800 |
| 1:38:51 | Average Match Time | 1:9:1 |
| 417.73 | Average Opponent Rank | 501.4 |
| 63% (13301/21207) | 1st Serve % | 62% (18800/30559) |
| 65% (8712/13301) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (13426/18800) |
| 51% (4007/7906) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5940/11758) |
| 43% (930/2161) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1384/3147) |
| 41% (8441/20820) | Return Points Win % | 40% (12359/30808) |
| 47% (7/8) | Slam W/L | 51% (24/23) |
| 60% (3/2) | Masters W/L | 36% (4/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 43% (3/4) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (24/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (49/68) | Challenger W/L | 67% (163/81) |
| 65% (116/62) | Futures W/L | 75% (221/74) |
| 55% (175/318) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 69% (418/609) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 48% (15/31) |
| 49% (41/84) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (112/201) |
| 62% (68/110) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (104/182) |
| 88% (155/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (416/375) |
| 12% (155/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (416/38) |
| 25% (167/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (234/61) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
